As someone with the experience of being a commish, I can tell you that I would never want to be the commissioner for a league where I'd have to monitor every team's situation against the cap manually.
It's easy to say "enforce a manual salary cap" when you're the GM, but then you don't have to be the one monitoring caps, voiding contracts etc for every turn of FA.
Also, voiding a contract "after the fact" messes up an entire bidding-run for a player, maybe an entire team's strategy.
Lets say I bid, "legally" for a player. Another team offers him a monster offer and I lose out. What we don't realize at this point, this particular round, is that the monster offer took the other team over the cap, so in the next round I bid for and sign a lower rated player to a slightly overpaying offer; but I have some cash I had intended for the first player so it's not that big of a deal and I fill my need though with a less talented player.
Then the issue with the first offer is discovered, and the contract is voided and the player is back on the market. Now there's no way I can afford my initial offer, and besided I've already signed a player to fill my need.. but I still would have preferred that my initial offer which was legal had gone through, because that other player was better.
Therefore, the guy who (and he will exist in every league) intentionally or most likely unintentionally broke the rule messed up for a) the commissioner, b) himself, and c) for every other GM who was interested in the player.
All because we had a MANUALLY MONITORED salary cap instead of an in-game salary cap that prevented the offer from being made to start with.
Do you now realize why manually monitored stuff won't work?
Besides.. I really think this discussion has gotten out of hand. This can be discussed in a civil manner but that's not what's going on here. Lets not accuse people left and right and question their competence; act as adults.
It's easy to say "enforce a manual salary cap" when you're the GM, but then you don't have to be the one monitoring caps, voiding contracts etc for every turn of FA.
Also, voiding a contract "after the fact" messes up an entire bidding-run for a player, maybe an entire team's strategy.
Lets say I bid, "legally" for a player. Another team offers him a monster offer and I lose out. What we don't realize at this point, this particular round, is that the monster offer took the other team over the cap, so in the next round I bid for and sign a lower rated player to a slightly overpaying offer; but I have some cash I had intended for the first player so it's not that big of a deal and I fill my need though with a less talented player.
Then the issue with the first offer is discovered, and the contract is voided and the player is back on the market. Now there's no way I can afford my initial offer, and besided I've already signed a player to fill my need.. but I still would have preferred that my initial offer which was legal had gone through, because that other player was better.
Therefore, the guy who (and he will exist in every league) intentionally or most likely unintentionally broke the rule messed up for a) the commissioner, b) himself, and c) for every other GM who was interested in the player.
All because we had a MANUALLY MONITORED salary cap instead of an in-game salary cap that prevented the offer from being made to start with.
Do you now realize why manually monitored stuff won't work?
Besides.. I really think this discussion has gotten out of hand. This can be discussed in a civil manner but that's not what's going on here. Lets not accuse people left and right and question their competence; act as adults.



Comment