Processed:TUL/DAK

[DakotaGeorge]

FWIW - my personal preference would be to see one or two more double-game weeks - but no big deal either way.

Agreed.

[Matt]

not sure if this trade is legal....or if this is collusion.

if it's determined that this was a pre determined trade as part of the previous TUL-DAK trade, I will be forced to penalize both teams.

3c. Draft Pick Trading:

Only picks in the in-game 3 year window are available to be traded. There will be no "future" picks allowed as part of a trade.

[DakotaGeorge]

not sure if this trade is legal....or if this is collusion.

if it's determined that this was a pre determined trade as part of the previous TUL-DAK trade, I will be forced to penalize both teams.

Um? What a Joke?

[DakotaGeorge]

This trade isnt blatantly lopsided and shouldnt even be up for discussion. collusion... what pots of glue have you been sniffing today. Like me and Tarcone have ever gotten along. Yep now we are in cahoots. again I will say Um? What? A Joke?!

[Matt]

not putting this through yet, but will run the stage.

[DakotaGeorge]

not putting this through yet, but will run the stage.

Sounds like bullshit Matt. What rule has been violated?

[DakotaGeorge]

Find it quite disgusting Matt. This trade isnt blatantly lopsided or anything that should be reviewed yet you are gonna pull this shady bullshit? Having trouble enough filling the GM Spots you do have open aka LRK and you go and alienate GMs who actually participate. Not one person complained about this cept you.

[Matt]

I didn't complain.

Are you saying that this trade wasn't made during the other "draft day" trade as part 2?

[DakotaGeorge]

I didn't complain.

Are you saying that this trade wasn't made during the other "draft day" trade as part 2?

This trade wasnt a draft day part 2 trade. It was a seperate discussed trade for a WR. You made it quite clear there couldnt be part 2s btw. So again the trade isnt blatantly lopsided and there were no previous complaints. So again ALIENATING GMs who actually participate. such a Low brow move.

[Matt]

ok, let's see if tarcone agrees that this was not a draft day part 2 trade.

[DakotaGeorge]

ok, let's see if tarcone agrees that this was not a draft day part 2 trade.

Thats fine with me. I think this looks highly unprofessional. You have no grounds to be doing this and I will tell you right now I am not happy with this. I think you are sitting here alienating 2 GMs who actually Participate in this league now for seasons. Funny thing is you alienate your GMs when you cant even fill all your GM spots. idk but im disgusted and done with this topic. Put the trade through or tell me what rule it violates. Simple.

[Matt]

3c. Draft Pick Trading:

Only picks in the in-game 3 year window are available to be traded. There will be no "future" picks allowed as part of a trade.

it breaks this rule....

[DakotaGeorge]

it breaks this rule....

Actually it doesn't. 2026 is within the 3 year window. The picks are in the game. You have no beef. Now can you show me what rule it violates now that we have debunked that?

[markc]

Actually it doesn't. 2026 is within the 3 year window. The picks are in the game. You have no beef. Now can you show me what rule it violates now that we have debunked that?

I'm not sure I understand. Prior to and during the draft, was it that the 3-year window was 2023-2024-2025 and immediately after the draft it becomes 2024-2025-2026?

[JesterBlaze]

89 Big Play ability, 7 year 53/53 WR, 90+ Special Teams. Knowing how BPA is viewed over at FOFC I can see someone paying a 1st and 2nd, especially when that GM is confident in his team. Just throwing this out there to hopefully calm the flames.