Sorry, I planned on cutting a bunch before camp. Due to the unrealistic way FOF does FA negotiations, and the compressed period in second FA, the only way to guarantee a larger camp is to make a ton of offers.
It's not like you can target 3-4 rookie RB's and invite them to camp, get a call back the next day with rejections then invite another 3.
I'd rather a new type of system where we post our intentions for unsigned rookies on the forum, each team allowed x amount, and we're allowed to sign them at the minimum rate (ties for players go to the teams with the worse records). At least for the top like 10 guys per position since it would be a nightmare trying to track the entire undrafted pool.
This way you not only know what players you're getting on the next stage, we also don't see ridiculous bidding wars over rookie FA's who are likely to bust anyway (I've been a part of those bidding wars).
There is a reason you don't see undrafted players getting signed to $9m+ contracts days after the draft in the NFL, and I'd like to see us do something about it here. As someone who loves getting undrafted players, I'd be all aboard a new system that fixes FOF's flaws.
Of course we can keep things as is, but it does suck for teams looking to find a diamond in the rough. Especially when we know there are teams with 40-50 million in cap space who can easily offer $2 million one-year contracts to the top 20 undrafted FA's and not blink an eye.
They can do stuff like that, then sign them to much cheaper contracts the next year. I seen two WR's with a combined rating of 79 sign for a combined cap hit of $13.2m this off-season with the intention of re-signing for cheaper next year. While there is little that can be done about that with UFA's, right now the undrafted pool is the wild west in terms of contracts.
Anyway, I will be cutting a lot of players, but don't start ripping on me because I'm trying to find quality rookies and can only do that by throwing a shitload of offers against the wall and seeing which ones stick after an export or two.
It's not like you can target 3-4 rookie RB's and invite them to camp, get a call back the next day with rejections then invite another 3.
I'd rather a new type of system where we post our intentions for unsigned rookies on the forum, each team allowed x amount, and we're allowed to sign them at the minimum rate (ties for players go to the teams with the worse records). At least for the top like 10 guys per position since it would be a nightmare trying to track the entire undrafted pool.
This way you not only know what players you're getting on the next stage, we also don't see ridiculous bidding wars over rookie FA's who are likely to bust anyway (I've been a part of those bidding wars).
There is a reason you don't see undrafted players getting signed to $9m+ contracts days after the draft in the NFL, and I'd like to see us do something about it here. As someone who loves getting undrafted players, I'd be all aboard a new system that fixes FOF's flaws.
Of course we can keep things as is, but it does suck for teams looking to find a diamond in the rough. Especially when we know there are teams with 40-50 million in cap space who can easily offer $2 million one-year contracts to the top 20 undrafted FA's and not blink an eye.
They can do stuff like that, then sign them to much cheaper contracts the next year. I seen two WR's with a combined rating of 79 sign for a combined cap hit of $13.2m this off-season with the intention of re-signing for cheaper next year. While there is little that can be done about that with UFA's, right now the undrafted pool is the wild west in terms of contracts.
Anyway, I will be cutting a lot of players, but don't start ripping on me because I'm trying to find quality rookies and can only do that by throwing a shitload of offers against the wall and seeing which ones stick after an export or two.
Comment