Originally posted by Jeff
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New constitution needs blessing
Collapse
X
-
Question: Has the global settings for injury always been 10% above the recommended default? If so, can I ask if this is necessary. I realize "stuff" happens, but there seems and inordinate amount of injuries lately. And its not that I'm not for having to reshuffle, but I've seen some "franchise" type players lose drastic ratings and are never the same. JMO.MIAMI VICE - 2074
Comment
-
I worded it that way in case the setting range changes. Right now it's 0-200, the default is 100, and we've always used 110 in the IFL.Originally posted by ArgotQuestion: Has the global settings for injury always been 10% above the recommended default? If so, can I ask if this is necessary. I realize "stuff" happens, but there seems and inordinate amount of injuries lately. And its not that I'm not for having to reshuffle, but I've seen some "franchise" type players lose drastic ratings and are never the same. JMO.
Jim and other hardcore players have maintained that a setting of 200 still doesn't cause a realistic number of injuries.
A little sidenote: As of yesterday, the Vikings had 4 good players on IR."Larry Deasoooooooooooooooooon" -- Phil Jenkins
Comment
-
I would vote for upping the injuries if anything.
My theory on injuries based upon experience in the IFL and IHOF is this:
The higher the injury setting, the more injuries you get. However, the additional injuries at the higher settings are typically minor in nature. The severe injuries you are going to get regardless of the injury setting. The IHOF has the injury setting at 150 - 175 and there seems to be a lot more minor injuries over there. Things of the 3-4 week range. As far as CEIs and severe injuries, I have had just as many, if not more of those type of injuries here.
So basically if you are getting one CEI a year, with higher injuries you would get:
1 CEI
2-3 - 4-5 week injuries
4-6 - 1-3 week injuries
Another item that plays a large roll in injuries is turf condition. Several teams have seen their turf condition go down in recent years, they need to fix their field and their injury problems should go away.
2003 IFL AC East Runner-Up - Wildcard 10-6
2004 IFL AC East Runner-UP - Wildcard - AC Runner-up 10-5-1
2005 3rd Place AC East 6-10 2007 2nd Place AC East 8-8
2006 3rd Place AC East 7-9 2008 2nd Place AC East 9-7
2009 1st Place AC East, Imperial Bowl Champions 13-3
Comment
-
my issue with conditional picks is that guys trade picks that they don't even have, and quite often. How are the commish's going to have time to regulate these types of transactions.NEWARK BULLDOGS WALL OF HONOR
DE JUSTIN JONES
LB DOMINGO PERSAUD
TE THOMAS MACOMBER
LT IRWIN KAO
WR ANDREW ROBEY
SS GREGORY BOYD
RB ALAN CRESPO
G MALCOLM "BIG KAT" SINGLETON
WR WALTER WALKER
G AMOS BAILEY
QB DWIGHT "KING" BURGER
RB GARY "THE SITUATION" JAMISON
WR JOSE HOOVER
K BUTCH SCHULZ
LB MACK EDWARDS
DE STEPHEN BRIGHAM
WR JESSE LUCAS
C NORMAN ENRIGHT
SS JUNIOR EL NIN0
Comment
-
The constitution looks good.
I would just like to comment that contracts are pretty solid right now. Even some of the more outrageous contracts I've seen in IHOF (we've never had any problems with them here), would shoot the team in the foot if the player got injured, cut, etc.
2003 IFL AC East Runner-Up - Wildcard 10-6
2004 IFL AC East Runner-UP - Wildcard - AC Runner-up 10-5-1
2005 3rd Place AC East 6-10 2007 2nd Place AC East 8-8
2006 3rd Place AC East 7-9 2008 2nd Place AC East 9-7
2009 1st Place AC East, Imperial Bowl Champions 13-3
Comment
-
That was my view of it. I loathe the idea of having to say to someone "oops, you traded a pick that was a conditional part of another trade and now you dont have it" and then having to figure out what to do. It's easy to say that each person can keep track of it, but people forget stuff, I forget stuff all the time.Originally posted by Mattmy issue with conditional picks is that guys trade picks that they don't even have, and quite often. How are the commish's going to have time to regulate these types of transactions.I luv British womenz.
Comment
-
It takes three seasons at least to get new turf, 4 because more often than not they reject the request on the first try.Originally posted by WarhammerAnother item that plays a large roll in injuries is turf condition. Several teams have seen their turf condition go down in recent years, they need to fix their field and their injury problems should go away.Los Angeles Matadors AC West Champs: 2037
Pittsburgh Power NC North Champs: 2005, 2006, 2009
Comment
-
Constitiution is solid IMO... Many of the concerns I saw have been brought up already.
As for conditional picks. I say NO. Simply because of what Matt brought up. Nothing worse then making a move to either get a pick or save cap space, only to have the trade nulled due to poor planning.
I do like what Jeff said about a penalty for not having the pick... But I do think it would put to much pressure on the commish.GM Columbia Fire
GM Georgia Generals
GM Columbia Fire
GM Norfolk Vipers
GM Norfolk Fleet
Comment
-
Last time this stuff came up at IHOF I mentioned this and the fact that most teams can change their turf quickly once they decide to do so. It is something that many teams just get absolutely hosed on because as you mentioned once something is determined to be done, you have to get it done or else your team gets hammered.Originally posted by MrBigglesworthIt takes three seasons at least to get new turf, 4 because more often than not they reject the request on the first try.Originally posted by WarhammerAnother item that plays a large roll in injuries is turf condition. Several teams have seen their turf condition go down in recent years, they need to fix their field and their injury problems should go away.
2003 IFL AC East Runner-Up - Wildcard 10-6
2004 IFL AC East Runner-UP - Wildcard - AC Runner-up 10-5-1
2005 3rd Place AC East 6-10 2007 2nd Place AC East 8-8
2006 3rd Place AC East 7-9 2008 2nd Place AC East 9-7
2009 1st Place AC East, Imperial Bowl Champions 13-3
Comment
-
We all do. Exactly. Well, except Jeff.Originally posted by SuicaneThat was my view of it. I loathe the idea of having to say to someone "oops, you traded a pick that was a conditional part of another trade and now you dont have it" and then having to figure out what to do. It's easy to say that each person can keep track of it, but people forget stuff, I forget stuff all the time.Originally posted by Mattmy issue with conditional picks is that guys trade picks that they don't even have, and quite often. How are the commish's going to have time to regulate these types of transactions.
I'd rather our new Overlords' time being spent on say... updating the HTML pages (I'd love to see the transaction list, injuries, cap numbers, or standings from work)... than playing referee on vague conditionals... If you have conditionals, you'll have more trades and you know it's going to get messy at some point. What are the conditions? When are their fruition dates? Who sets them? Who enforces them? Who makes sure they're met? Who keeps track?
Comment


Comment