Tweet
That's why I still like this game and don't put as much as most into the FOFC studies. For whatever combined reasons I've been able to have great offensive success despite a relative lack of formations. Could be because I go heavy on certain formations in certain situations and hope they balance out in the end. Could be because the Kozure's of the league aren't here running 16-0 seasons with a bottom 5 Power Ranking. As long as there's unknowns things are still fun for me.
"Sugar" seems to be proving a good example of how FOFC's "point for point" data collection might be incorrect. Not only am I unaware of Jim ever saying things are linear, but he has stated that he wants the top paid $$ to be worth it. "Sugar" blasted THREE HUGE TOUCHDOWN runs in one game. Could very well be that each skill is not only more effective as you raise it in attribute level, but that certain combinations of specific high skill levels is even more so than the sum of each part.
"Sugar" seems to be proving a good example of how FOFC's "point for point" data collection might be incorrect. Not only am I unaware of Jim ever saying things are linear, but he has stated that he wants the top paid $$ to be worth it. "Sugar" blasted THREE HUGE TOUCHDOWN runs in one game. Could very well be that each skill is not only more effective as you raise it in attribute level, but that certain combinations of specific high skill levels is even more so than the sum of each part.
Comment