Official Post Season Schedule

[Jave]

I agree with getting though pre-season quicker but not at the cost of
realism. Injurys happen in the NFL and to good players too. Two Q.B.'s went down last week. So I would be against turning injurys off. I dont think we need midweeks between the games. And games 1 and 2 together is fine.

My point is, say my starting, 77 rated defensive tackle gets a sprained ankle for 2 weeks. If I don't have the opportunity to inactive him and we chain run the games together, he plays on it the next week, and seriously injures it for 8 weeks I'm gonna be pissed. I'm all for realism, but I need to chance to work my roster so things like that don't happen.

[JesterBlaze]

My point is, say my starting, 77 rated defensive tackle gets a sprained ankle for 2 weeks. If I don't have the opportunity to inactive him and we chain run the games together, he plays on it the next week, and seriously injures it for 8 weeks I'm gonna be pissed. I'm all for realism, but I need to chance to work my roster so things like that don't happen.

Would setting the "use of injured players" to "0" alleviate this possibility?


I hate the idea of simming multiple games together but throw this out there simply as additional input to the running conversation. :dancemonkey:

[kingfc22]

Would setting the "use of injured players" to "0" alleviate this possibility?

I would not vote for this. I like the fact that injuries are part of the preseason and that GM's have to weigh this on their mind when creating depth charts.

[JesterBlaze]

I would not vote for this. I like the fact that injuries are part of the preseason and that GM's have to weigh this on their mind when creating depth charts.

There would be no vote. "Use of injured players" is an individual setting for each GM on one of our gameplanning screens.

[Matt]

i think kingfc is saying for the commish to turn the injuries off.

[W0LF3MAN813]

I DEMANDETH THOU TO CEASE ALL THIS CRAZY TALK!

at least until I get my team together hahaha