Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2k7 Version 6.1 released

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Well, it's not TCY2 but i will take it. Hopefully i can get home sometime soon to download.
    My banner is bigger and prettier and cooler then yours. I choose not to show it so your feelings do not get hurt.

    Comment


    • #17
      VPI97 wrote:
      FYI,

      I just exchanged words with Jim and you guys should go ahead and upgrade. My take is that anyone running the new version will have a more accurate view of players, so if only some of you do it, those people would have a competitive advantage.

      Meanwhile, I'm going to stick with the old version until the end of the playoffs. Seems that switching up in mid stream may lead to some funky stats and I'm not going to risk the integrity of the playoffs by upgrading at this point in the season.

      THIS HAS BEEN AN OFFICIAL DECREE


      My take of VPI's post ... allow all to see the scouting changes by letting anyone who wants to upgrade. However, he will run the games on the old engine until the end of the season to preserve integrity of the season activity including statistics.

      Comment


      • #18
        thank you SD, for sharing your information.


        Claire, That's Disgusting - A Heroes Blog

        Comment


        • #19
          one thing i don't understand, if the player ratings don't change by more than a couple points then doesn't that mean the scouts were more accurate than we thought? if so, doesn't it make it moot that Jim changed the scout's probability for error? i forget, he either made it more likely for the scout's to be wrong or he decreased the amount of error. but if they were only off by a couple points then it doesn't seem it was all that broken to begin with. or am i not getting something?


          Claire, That's Disgusting - A Heroes Blog

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Hell Atlantic View Post
            one thing i don't understand, if the player ratings don't change by more than a couple points then doesn't that mean the scouts were more accurate than we thought? if so, doesn't it make it moot that Jim changed the scout's probability for error? i forget, he either made it more likely for the scout's to be wrong or he decreased the amount of error. but if they were only off by a couple points then it doesn't seem it was all that broken to begin with. or am i not getting something?
            From what I understand, the unmasking of things takes place quicker. So, if the mask was off, nothing will change. If the mask is not off, he may gain or lose a couple of points in a direction of the change. How significant the change is based upon how far off the evaluation was.

            2003 IFL AC East Runner-Up - Wildcard 10-6
            2004 IFL AC East Runner-UP - Wildcard - AC Runner-up 10-5-1
            2005 3rd Place AC East 6-10 2007 2nd Place AC East 8-8
            2006 3rd Place AC East 7-9 2008 2nd Place AC East 9-7
            2009 1st Place AC East, Imperial Bowl Champions 13-3

            Comment


            • #21
              i had my QB in another league go up 5 points in current and future. My scout is poor in QB, so I still don't know anything
              NEWARK BULLDOGS WALL OF HONOR
              DE JUSTIN JONES
              LB DOMINGO PERSAUD
              TE THOMAS MACOMBER
              LT IRWIN KAO
              WR ANDREW ROBEY
              SS GREGORY BOYD
              RB ALAN CRESPO
              G MALCOLM "BIG KAT" SINGLETON
              WR WALTER WALKER
              G AMOS BAILEY
              QB DWIGHT "KING" BURGER
              RB GARY "THE SITUATION" JAMISON
              WR JOSE HOOVER
              K BUTCH SCHULZ
              LB MACK EDWARDS
              DE STEPHEN BRIGHAM
              WR JESSE LUCAS
              C NORMAN ENRIGHT
              SS JUNIOR EL NIN0



              Comment


              • #22
                The 6.1 patch was updated sometime early this morning, so if you downloaded it yesterday you might want to re-download.
                "Larry Deasoooooooooooooooooon" -- Phil Jenkins

                Comment


                • #23
                  procastinators rejoice!
                  sigpic

                  Mules of Fame
                  Otis 'Opie' Peterson

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    oh man...now I can kill! Suicane rubber ducky

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Hell Atlantic View Post
                      one thing i don't understand, if the player ratings don't change by more than a couple points then doesn't that mean the scouts were more accurate than we thought? if so, doesn't it make it moot that Jim changed the scout's probability for error? i forget, he either made it more likely for the scout's to be wrong or he decreased the amount of error. but if they were only off by a couple points then it doesn't seem it was all that broken to begin with. or am i not getting something?
                      There are at least two known mechanisms at work here. There's the rate of unmasking, which has been accelerated in 6.1 (and that's probably why we see the slew of +/- 2 point guys). That's not a huge effect. The draft classes are much different now, though--not nearly as many heavily masked players, from what I can tell so far. (If y'all are still on TCY drafts, then I expect you probably won't see this.) It looks like it's most significant for leagues that use FOF-generated draft classes, and for SP.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X