Texas Block: DE (65/65) and SLB (53/53) available

[sjshaw]

SILB [ifl]Troy Calabrese[/ifl] (53/53)




DE [ifl]Gregory Shook[/ifl] (65/65)




I don't have a value in mind right now, so make an offer and I'll see what the market is like.

What is the code to link players to their HTML page?

[Coder]

Use the {ifl} and {/ifl} tags..

And the general consensus, apart from Jave ;-), is to not post screenshots of the ratings. Takes away the scouting-part of things

[sjshaw]

Use the {ifl} and {/ifl} tags..

And the general consensus, apart from Jave ;-), is to not post screenshots of the ratings. Takes away the scouting-part of things

Thanks for the tag tip.

In FOFL, we've pretty much determined that scouting is imaginary uselessness, except for underrated/overrated tags for draftees. If I'm violating a rule, then I'll take them down.

[Jave]

Bahhh, don't listen to them, I use the screenshots to. If I want to know if a player is worth my time a SS is the quickest way for me to see if the player is going to fit into the scheme I am using. The IFL tags blow as I have to load up the game and go hunt the player down to see what his skills are and if he is worth a crap. Usually this is a time consuming process and posting a SS saves me the time. Espically since this time of year there is a dozen posts a day regarding trades it's handy to filter out the crap players owners like Dberner consistently post as trade bait.

[JesterBlaze]

I don't know why you guys don't just cut off the attribute #'s when making the screenies. The bars alone show what kind of player someone is without being too exact - unless someone wants to start measuring their exact lengths.

Not that the screenies really bother me but it's a simple step to keep both sides of the screenshot argument semi-happy.

[sjshaw]

Shook gone, Calabrese still available.