Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Wichita/Texas

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    GOT IT. see I said I was slow. Yep CAP busters for sure.

    Thanks for splainin'
    sigpic

    Mules of Fame
    Otis 'Opie' Peterson

    Comment


    • #17
      Not really a cap buster: the difference here would be less than $1.5 million on next year's cap. Nothing to just throw away, that's for sure, but not an insurmountable difference. Plus, that money would be taken off of future caps in the third and fourth rounds of the draft.
      Los Angeles Matadors AC West Champs: 2037

      Pittsburgh Power NC North Champs: 2005, 2006, 2009

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by MrBigglesworth
        Not really a cap buster: the difference here would be less than $1.5 million on next year's cap. Nothing to just throw away, that's for sure, but not an insurmountable difference. Plus, that money would be taken off of future caps in the third and fourth rounds of the draft.
        Big talk for you. Wichita is flirting with the very edge of the cap limits. Unlike you cheapskates who are trying to make a buck at this we blow all our money.
        GM Wichita Outlaws

        Comment


        • #19
          Hey, I see $1.5 million you can save: realease that bum Granger!
          Los Angeles Matadors AC West Champs: 2037

          Pittsburgh Power NC North Champs: 2005, 2006, 2009

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by MrBigglesworth
            Hey, I see $1.5 million you can save: realease that bum Granger!
            That bum might be the starter this year or an overqualified backup.
            GM Wichita Outlaws

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Jeff
              Allowing a trade like this would open a Pandora's box. It would basically mean that any players already picked could be traded as long as Cringer hadn't already entered them into the game. Cringer and I talked about this our first offseason and decided it wasn't something we wanted to allow - maybe it needs to be written down.
              Sorry I was in a hurry before and couldn't take the tme to explain. This is pretty much it.

              Also, there have been owners in the past who have had a player selected for them and where not happy about who it was. They had to live with, and the rules are not going to be changed now in part because it would be unfair to them to do so. So I would go from having one guy pissed off to 3 or 4.

              This shit can be prevented. You make a list. You do not have to turn it on, incase you want to try to make a live pick. But if you miss your deadline, then the mods have your list to go off of instead of te in-game needs.
              My banner is bigger and prettier and cooler then yours. I choose not to show it so your feelings do not get hurt.

              Comment


              • #22
                Sorry this is still popping up, um Im cool with everything that happened all the way around. I was being an ass, next time I will give a list to someone if i think I might miss. It was lack of fore-thought on my part not lack of caring or Respect for the rest of the League.
                GM-Texas HellRiders

                Comment


                • #23
                  As before Im fine either way. I had the LB on my list at 29 so it was not sweat for me to swap spots to make it a win-win. Im also fine with the TE.

                  I know what this is really about anyway. Forcing me to stay at 1-29 helped keep the mock draft showing Wichita at 1-29 taking the TE Molnar that we selected. Its all a press conspiracy.
                  GM Wichita Outlaws

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X