WIC/AQU

[dberner30]

WIC sends WR Scharf, FB Bartel, WIC 2nd in 07 and WIC 3rd in 08
and
AQU sends 1-21, 3-3, AQU 1st in 07, AQU 1st in 08

[hawkster]

confirmazoid

[roadrash]

shit

[MrBigglesworth]

[roadrash]

Re: WIC/AQU

WIC sends WR Scharf, FB Bartel, WIC 2nd in 07 and WIC 3rd in 08
and
AQU sends 1-21, 3-3, AQU 1st in 07, AQU 1st in 08

JaveGate is already used. . so how about the "Great Albuquerque Bank Heist of 2005" or GABH05

Sound good?

or how about "Scharf Rape"

but that might get Suicane excited. . .

or

"dberner gives the bone"

[sovstar]

I think the trade is pretty damn even to be honest; not even close to JaveGate material. Surprised that Wichita is giving up Scharf though.

[sovstar]

Re: WIC/AQU

WIC sends WR Scharf, FB Bartel, WIC 2nd in 07 and WIC 3rd in 08
and
AQU sends 1-21, 3-3, AQU 1st in 07, AQU 1st in 08

Here's my breakdown:

Bartel = 2007 1st
Scharf = 1-21 and 3-3

WIC 2007 2nd and WIC 2008 3rd versus AQU 2008 1st

I guess the last part all depends on how you value future picks. 2008 is a ways off.

[roadrash]

Unless the Mats finish well in the next two years, this could be grossly one sided

[roadrash]

Re: WIC/AQU

WIC sends WR Scharf, FB Bartel, WIC 2nd in 07 and WIC 3rd in 08
and
AQU sends 1-21, 3-3, AQU 1st in 07, AQU 1st in 08

Here's my breakdown:

Bartel = 2007 1st
Scharf = 1-21 and 3-3

WIC 2007 2nd and WIC 2008 3rd versus AQU 2008 1st

I guess the last part all depends on how you value future picks. 2008 is a ways off.

I don't think Bartel is work a first rouder, except maybe to SLC.

and AQU has gotta win this year. . I don't see them competing in 08. . in fact Scharf may not even get resigned next year. . .have to tag him I am guessing

[sovstar]

Re: WIC/AQU

I don't think Bartel is work a first rouder, except maybe to SLC.

To me, a 2007 1st is worth less than a 2006.

and AQU has gotta win this year. . I don't see them competing in 08. . in fact Scharf may not even get resigned next year. . .have to tag him I am guessing

I really don't like to speculate how teams' picks will end up . I simply consider the picks to be in the middle of the road. I thought the Matadors were gonna win the AFC this last season, so...

[dberner30]

Wichita is simply looking at doing some retooling for the future. We will not be able to resign Scharf and we have started accumulating picks. We are gonna make a run at competing and try to bring on youth for the future at the same time. Scharf (while a stud) didnt fit that plan very well. I have gotten a number of players that are key to WIC in the next few years under contract. WOuld love him to be a part but just couldnt make it all work. I lower the value of future picks and look at them as being later round picks.

[roadrash]

Re: WIC/AQU

I don't think Bartel is work a first rouder, except maybe to SLC.

To me, a 2007 1st is worth less than a 2006.

and AQU has gotta win this year. . I don't see them competing in 08. . in fact Scharf may not even get resigned next year. . .have to tag him I am guessing

I really don't like to speculate how teams' picks will end up . I simply consider the picks to be in the middle of the road. I thought the Matadors were gonna win the AFC this last season, so...

Your right, this can, like you, go either way. . .I am cheering for the Mats. . but it is very risky for the Mats

[dberner30]

no it is risky for Wichita. We have all the picks coming our way. He got know commodities in players. I have picks from 1 to 32 with no idea what those draft pools look like.

[roadrash]

no it is risky for Wichita. We have all the picks coming our way. He got know commodities in players. I have picks from 1 to 32 with no idea what those draft pools look like.

I don't think that picks are as risky as everyone thinks. . .You can generally get a feel for how a team is going to do. . if nothing else, they finish 1-16 and you get a good chance of getting a starter at a need position. Plus the ability to move up in the draft can always come to play.

Now that I have calmed down about a division rival getting 3 1sts, I guess the trade is fairly even in intent. Not having Sharf this year could be a big blow for WIC in getting back to the top. But they can easily replace him with another player in the draft that should at least come close to matching those numbers.

I guess I value draft picks more than everyone else. . .maybe too much

[dberner30]

well in that case i have some sweet picks for trade if you have great young players under contract...