Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AC East Positional Breakdown

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AC East Positional Breakdown

    This is a combination of past performance and expected performance in the coming year. All opinions are my own, and are open to debate.

    QB

    1. Harold Lozier is the best QB in the league right now and has an IFL Championship Ring to prove it. He is also the best QB in the AC East hands down.

    2. Jim Hickman is the surprise #2 QB on this list. He surpasses both Mulcahy and Sante. Unlike Hickman is a bit more consistent than Sante, and does not take as many sacks. He has also scored some TDs with his feet with two in the past year. Many of the TDs this past year was due to more of the offense leaning on him, and not having the top flight receivers that could get open consistently. The result was more INTs.

    3. Reuben Sante is the #3 QB in the AC East. He has the tools, but is this the year he puts it all together? He has had quality targets in his WRs, but he has been unable to get the job done. This year he should take another stride forward, if he doesn't it will be a long year in Boston.

    4. Jared Mulcahy brings up the end of the list. He will never be confused with the "Colonel," but he is a heady QB who will not lose many games for you. Unfortunately, he does not have the same tools that he had in Columbia so do not be surprised if there is a drop in his QB rating this year.

    RB

    1. Quick, name which RB ran for the most yards in the AC East last year! If you said Stanley Jamison, you're correct! He's back, and he has a revamped OL in front of him. Expect big things from Stanley this year. Over the last six games of last season, Jamison rushed for 649 yards on 147 carries, good for a 4.41 YPA, and 6 TDs. With defenses expected to respect Hartford's WRs, Jamison should find new lanes to run in.

    2. Norfolk's William Brown is the next guy on the list. He slipped a bit in 2006, finishing just shy of 1000 yards. However, don't be fooled, he is still one of the primary cogs in the Norfolk attack as he added 431 yards receiving to his rushing totals. He is the complete package and if you decide to stop the "Finger," you'll get the shaft as Brown shoves it down your throat.

    3. Boston's two headed beast could be the next coming of the Byner and Mack attack, or it could be a disaster. However, there is talent here with Tory Wigfall as the battering ram and Tony Moriarty picking his holes behind his OL. The downfall of this attack is going to be the offensive line. Although Boston has two bookends, they have nowhere to run inside.

    4. With the departure of Abraham Spangler, West Virginia lost the franchise's leading rusher. Nicky Kersey appears to be primed to step into the starter's role, but yards will be hard to come by. Expect opponent's to stack the line and dare Mulcahy to beat them.

    OL

    1. This may be a bit of a surprise. Hartford's OL gets the nod here as the best line in the East, narrowly beating out the Vipers' line. First, the line gave up 13 fewer sacks than the Vipers' line did. Additionally, the line opened up more holes in the running game than Norfolk's did. It might be comraderie that has put the Grizzlies line over the top, the guys genuinely like each other, and if one player gives up a play, they feel like they all did.

    2. On paper, Norfolk has the best line in the division. However, the results have not been up to what you would expect. Still, if this line can put everything together, it can be the dominant line in the division.

    3. Boston's line is nothing to sneeze at, but it is also nothing to fear either. However, they do seem to get more out of their abilities than Norfolk's line, but you get the feeling watching these guys that they are playing as well as they can. Some parts of the line are aging and one has to wonder when their performance will begin tailing off.

    4. West Virginia's line is not the proud unit of year's past that formed the battle line that the "Colonel" orchestrated his gridiron magic behind. However, they are attempting to infuse youth into the aging unit by drafting several young interior linemen. This may help this unit out in the long run, but this will be a long year for them.

    TE

    1. Jerald Harden is easily the best TE in the division. The guy can do everything. However, though he is a capable blocker, given that Brown likes to pound it between the tackles, he does nto get the opportunities to help out in the running game as Lee does for the Beasts. He has led the Vipers in receiving each of the last two years.

    2. "Lighthorse" Henry Lee has been one of the best dual threats at the position since the league was founded. He has sure hands, but can also open holes in the running game.

    3. Closely behind Lee in terms of performance is Fletcher Sala. Sala has led the Grizzlies in receiving each of the past two years. He is also a capable blocker when Jamison goes to the outside.

    4. Weldon Brownell is a capable player, but Sante rarely looks for him. He only caught 24 passes last year. However, he is a capable blocker in the running game.

    WR

    1. We're going with the proven unit here. Norfolk's WR corps has accomplished more than the more talented Boston crew the past few years. However, they do not have the best talent in the division. If Sante gets his act together, Boston's receivers might take the top spot.

    2. Hartford made some major moves in the off-season. Gary Ferreira caught 51 passes last year for the Matadors, as their third option. Ed Gaylor has caught 153 passes the last two seasons, and immediately moves into the #2 WR position. Provided Hickman can get the ball to these guys, they will make plays. Hartford also has the best depth in the division as they go five deep.

    3. Boston has the best top 3 WRs on paper, but it they need to turn their potential into production. However, the bigger culprits in their lack of productivity is the OL and Sante. If they can turn those positions around, expect these guys to shine.

    4. Weaver and Simpson might be a dynamic duo in years to come, don't expect it this year. Simpson is still at the top of his game, but will the ball get in range for him to do something with it?

    Defensive Line

    1. If the rumors out of camp are to be believed, Boston's line is going to be tops in the division. With the acquisition of Raymond Webb, the line was immediately improved. When Fritz Gaddas was picked up, he was expected to play in limited duty. However, the news out of camp is that he has been the best player on the defensive side of the ball. For someone to steal headlines from Ames, he must be special.

    2. West Virginia returns a very unheralded, but very effective line. They return 3 players to the front line that had at least 40 tackles and 3 sacks. Very efficient and productive if you ask us.

    3. Hartford's Bryce Tan might get all the headlines, but this line gets production across the board. Andy Rick had 40 tackles last year, and just keeps getting the job done. Randall Williamson turned in 22 tackles and 6.5 sacks last season in splitting time with Rufus Swett.

    4. There is talent here for Norfolk, but not when compared to the rest of the division. Robbie Devore is on the downside of his career, but Karl Austin appears primed to take his place late this year, or early next season.

    LB

    1. In what was the toughest position to rate, Boston's LB corps takes first, edging out Norfolk's unit. They got 211 tackles out of their ILBs , and their OLBs posted respectable stats as well.

    2. Norfolk's LBs take second in a close race. Their production out of their ILBs is nothing less than extraordinary. They got 194 tackles out of the ILBs last year, and they weren't too shabby against the pass either.

    3. Hartford's unit goes 6 deep, and those players posted 320 tackles. As this unit improves, expect them to inch up this list, but the productivity of their defensive line hurts their numbers a bit.

    4. West Virginia lacks the depth of the top three teams in the division. However, Noah is still one of the top ILBs in the league.

    DBs

    1. Based on past performance West Virginia's secondary appears to be the best in the division, however this appears to be by default.

    2. Boston has the potential to be the best in the division, but they have a hole at the second safety position. If Quinn Surdyk is ready to step into the role, this team could easily have the best unit in the division.

    3. Norfolk's unit is respectable, but they lack complementary skills across the board. They are susceptable to the big play as seen in last year's IFL Bowl.

    4. Hartford retooled the secondary in the off-season. Seifert is a good cover man, but the #2 CB position still needs to be filled. Roy Brown seems to be slipping, but Steve Frauso fills the #2 safety position, and should move into Brown's SS position next season.

    2003 IFL AC East Runner-Up - Wildcard 10-6
    2004 IFL AC East Runner-UP - Wildcard - AC Runner-up 10-5-1
    2005 3rd Place AC East 6-10 2007 2nd Place AC East 8-8
    2006 3rd Place AC East 7-9 2008 2nd Place AC East 9-7
    2009 1st Place AC East, Imperial Bowl Champions 13-3

  • #2
    Nice work Warhammer. I can't wait for this season to start.
    2013 AC East Champions

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by kingfc22
      Nice work Warhammer. I can't wait for this season to start.
      Thanks, I was doing this for myself to see how everyone stacks up, and figured others might want to see it.

      The positions that really surprised me were OL, LB, and secondary. My OL was more productive than Norfolk's more talented line, which was a surprise. I figured that my LBs would be #1 or #2, but I had to put them at #3 after seeing the production that you guys were getting at ILB. I was getting some production from my platoon back there, but nothing like what you and r00k are getting out of your starters. However, I think my Defensive Line plays a role in that, since we got a lot more tackles out of our DL than the two of you. I think WVA's LBs suffered from the same thing, their DL was a big surprise.

      What surprised me in the secondary was how mediocre they are. You have a hole or two, but have a promising young secondary. Norfolk and Hartford appear to be more system types with players that fit a system. WVA surprised me here as well in the amount of production they got out of their secondary. I think NFK and HAR can perform better than their personnel, but I've seen NFK get burned a bit, and I am interested to see how my changes will affect my coverage. But, Brown's decline hurts quite a bit because I was not expecting as much of a decline in his zone numbers. Still, I have 2 solid zone defenders and 2 excellent zone defenders back there now, which is far better than what I had last year.

      I think Boston's problem this year will be keeping Sante upright. The line is not really geared towards running the ball, and there is little in the middle to protect against any pass rush there. If Sante is hurried or on his back, he's going to make mistakes. If you turn the ball over too much, it won't matter how good your defense is, you won't be able to compete. But, if the line performs above expectations, you could have a special year.

      Norfolk has most of the tools to repeat, but I have questions about their secondary.

      I finally have the horses on offense, no excuses this year. My problem is going to be the secondary, but my front seven are stout enough against the run that I should be able to hedge a bit against the pass. This squad could be my best defense, but it could also lay an egg. The plus side is that I have starters figured out for every position, Martin will be starting at LB this year, Frausto upgrades the secondary, Lister appears to have the #2 CB slot (unless Pitman really progresses), and if Fisk can step in at RDE I will be in great shape. Offensively, I can either pound the ball or open things up in the passing game. I might go 50 for every situation! :twisted:

      2003 IFL AC East Runner-Up - Wildcard 10-6
      2004 IFL AC East Runner-UP - Wildcard - AC Runner-up 10-5-1
      2005 3rd Place AC East 6-10 2007 2nd Place AC East 8-8
      2006 3rd Place AC East 7-9 2008 2nd Place AC East 9-7
      2009 1st Place AC East, Imperial Bowl Champions 13-3

      Comment


      • #4
        Excellent analysis.

        If you ever get fired as GM of the Grizz, I'll put a good word in for you at Imperial HQ
        IMPERIAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
        NATIONAL MEDIA

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Vic Carucci
          Excellent analysis.

          If you ever get fired as GM of the Grizz, I'll put a good word in for you at Imperial HQ
          Thanks Vic! But, I don't see myself giving up this post until I win the title at least!

          2003 IFL AC East Runner-Up - Wildcard 10-6
          2004 IFL AC East Runner-UP - Wildcard - AC Runner-up 10-5-1
          2005 3rd Place AC East 6-10 2007 2nd Place AC East 8-8
          2006 3rd Place AC East 7-9 2008 2nd Place AC East 9-7
          2009 1st Place AC East, Imperial Bowl Champions 13-3

          Comment


          • #6
            Lots of good research and thoughful insights.

            I woud concur with most of your conclusions and when I had a different thought, it is mostly a result of my personal approach to the game.

            Good read ... and looking forward to defending the divisional title.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by r00k
              Lots of good research and thoughful insights.

              I woud concur with most of your conclusions and when I had a different thought, it is mostly a result of my personal approach to the game.

              Good read ... and looking forward to defending the divisional title.
              I could see you disagreeing with the RB. I was actually going to look at Jamison as third until I saw what he did over the last 6 games last year. I had made some offensive changes at that point that resulted in him producing substantially more.

              OL my decision was based entirely on last year's production. I have a lot of affinities up there, so I think the line plays over its head. Plus, Stubblefied is an upgrade as is Overton at their spots. Plus, Stubblefield adds to the affinities up there.

              I probably should have looked at front 7s, rather than DL and LB separately. However, little would change. Boston's would be the top unit, then a tie for #2 between NFK and HAR (the squads are really that close). Then WVA would be last.

              In any case, BOS, NFK, and HAR should have top 10 defenses this year. I think the difference in team performance will come on offense. Offenses would be ranked:

              1) NFK Lozier is the best QB hands down, and the rest of the positions are close enough that you could argue NFK's unit is best.
              2) HAR Hartman is maturing, and with new receivers and an improved running game, HAR will be much more dynamic and have much better production.
              3) BOS It all comes down to the OL. I think Sante is going to be pressured too much to make a difference. Their running game will be good, but the defenses in the division are all excellent against the run.
              4) WVA The line is in shambles, and the lack the skill players they once had. Kersey will be good, but will struggle as defenses gear up to stop him.

              2003 IFL AC East Runner-Up - Wildcard 10-6
              2004 IFL AC East Runner-UP - Wildcard - AC Runner-up 10-5-1
              2005 3rd Place AC East 6-10 2007 2nd Place AC East 8-8
              2006 3rd Place AC East 7-9 2008 2nd Place AC East 9-7
              2009 1st Place AC East, Imperial Bowl Champions 13-3

              Comment

              Working...
              X