Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2006 Windmill Power Ratings, Week 9

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Geeeees, yes sir. :?


    :P
    My banner is bigger and prettier and cooler then yours. I choose not to show it so your feelings do not get hurt.

    Comment


    • #17
      I wholeheartedly disagree with these rankings, and for no dang good reason other than I want to be obstinate.
      sigpic

      Mules of Fame
      Otis 'Opie' Peterson

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by MrBigglesworth
        Three of the bottom 4 teams are from the AFC, and only 2 of the top 8 are from the American.

        AFC is teh suck!
        Yeah, but if offensive differential is a big deal then teams like me drag them down, because no one has a big yardage differential either way against me! Plus, since my record is poor, I hurt their SOS. I think the AC is not given enough credit!

        2003 IFL AC East Runner-Up - Wildcard 10-6
        2004 IFL AC East Runner-UP - Wildcard - AC Runner-up 10-5-1
        2005 3rd Place AC East 6-10 2007 2nd Place AC East 8-8
        2006 3rd Place AC East 7-9 2008 2nd Place AC East 9-7
        2009 1st Place AC East, Imperial Bowl Champions 13-3

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Cringer
          Geeeees, yes sir. :?


          :P
          tee hee ops:
          NEWARK BULLDOGS WALL OF HONOR
          DE JUSTIN JONES
          LB DOMINGO PERSAUD
          TE THOMAS MACOMBER
          LT IRWIN KAO
          WR ANDREW ROBEY
          SS GREGORY BOYD
          RB ALAN CRESPO
          G MALCOLM "BIG KAT" SINGLETON
          WR WALTER WALKER
          G AMOS BAILEY
          QB DWIGHT "KING" BURGER
          RB GARY "THE SITUATION" JAMISON
          WR JOSE HOOVER
          K BUTCH SCHULZ
          LB MACK EDWARDS
          DE STEPHEN BRIGHAM
          WR JESSE LUCAS
          C NORMAN ENRIGHT
          SS JUNIOR EL NIN0



          Comment


          • #20
            Up to 18.
            I luv British womenz.

            Comment


            • #21
              The people demand updated ranks, and by people I mean Albuquerque fans (both of them)

              Comment


              • #22
                Sorry, guys.

                If I didn't say it before, these ratings are a bitch. Takes anywhere from 30-45 minutes to do as barely anything is automated in the process.

                I did run them today and I wasn't happy with the results (Anchorage was #1, ALQ was #5 FYI). Maybe at some point I'll come up with some fresh ideas and make some better ratings. It just comes down to them being really time-consuming. And I couldn't imagine how much harder they would be if I added in more complex stuff, which is what would need to be done to get better results.
                "Larry Deasoooooooooooooooooon" -- Phil Jenkins

                Comment


                • #23
                  Could shoe size be a facotr? Cause size 14 right here says im the tops.
                  I luv British womenz.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X