What constitutes "past injustices"?

[JesterBlaze]

Is it simply slapping on the Franchise Tag, as I've always thought, or is it not giving in to hold-outs? I forgot that I told Stanfield to go screw everytime he held out and maybe that's why he eventually wouldn't re-sign.

[Coder]

I doubt it.. at least that's not how it went down with Pearson for me. I tagged him two years in a row without him holding out and then the second year I tried offering him a new deal after the tag and he refused citing the good ole injustices.. bastard.

[Kobeck]

I've had guys I cut just before w1 refuse to sign later in the season

[Kozure]

Jester, if you do no sign your QB, and he ends his holdout, in all likelihood he will not resign with you. Simply put. You will get past injustices messages.

But if a guy's loyalty is high enough (if the game actually uses loyalty to determine this), maybe he will resign.

Also, in rare cases you can still sign a guy after franchising him twice in a row. But there is also a franchise rule prohibiting the franchising of a player after having a 1-year contract. Not sure if a franchise tag counts as a one-year contract. So you may not be able to franchise a player two years in a row anyhow if you were thinking of going that route.

[JesterBlaze]

Jester, if you do no sign your QB, and he ends his holdout, in all likelihood he will not resign with you. Simply put. You will get past injustices messages.

haha Thanks.

I have no problem giving Amos a new contract. I just feel we should use the most recent QB contract, the QB who beat Amos in the post-season, as the starting point and go DOWN from there.

Oh well, gotta pay these 3rd round picks I guess.