More proof that the power ratings in the game don't mean shit. I was a bit offended last week when it had me as dead fucking last in the league in the power ratings. So after SLC beat me, they promoted themselves to dead last in the league. Do what? What the hell formula does the game use any damn way??
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
More proof
Collapse
X
-
((Stadium Seating/Team Color) - Wins in the year 5th prior) * 2(coaches motivational rating/back-up ILB OVR)...Originally posted by Jave View PostWhat the hell formula does the game use any damn way??
... all "to the power" of the punter's loyalty rating.
It's all quite simple really.
<a href="http://glb2.warriorgeneral.com/game/signup.pl?ref=10223"><img src="http://goallineblitz.com/images/game/design/glb_badge-180x60.gif" /></a>
IFL Champions: 2011, 2013, 2022, 2023.
Comment
-
What's happening there is that the Power Rating formula completely changes early in the regular season. Here's how it works:
UP TO AND INCLUDING REGULAR SEASON WEEK TWO: The number displayed is nothing more than the "Roster" rating on the franchise value screen. In other words, it has nothing to do with past performance, or even the performance in Week 1's games. It's just looking at your roster and rating you position-by-position against the rest of the league's talent. This number can be heavily skewed if you have a zero or very low score for one or more positions, even if it's a position that your game plan de-emphasizes. For example, if a team has no fullbacks, the Roster Rating will be significantly less than the team's true talent level, even if said team's game plan is to use single-back formations 100% of the time.
REGULAR SEASON WEEK THREE & AFTERWARD: The power rating displayed is 100% performance-based. I don't know all of the components, but it's clear that scoring differential and strength of schedule are major parts of this. There is noroster-related adjustment to the calculation after week two is complete. Like any computerized power rating, its accuracy increases as more games are played.
Comment
-
Ohh ok, that makes total sense then. Thanks for the info Skydog.Originally posted by SkyDog View PostWhat's happening there is that the Power Rating formula completely changes early in the regular season. Here's how it works:
UP TO AND INCLUDING REGULAR SEASON WEEK TWO: The number displayed is nothing more than the "Roster" rating on the franchise value screen. In other words, it has nothing to do with past performance, or even the performance in Week 1's games. It's just looking at your roster and rating you position-by-position against the rest of the league's talent. This number can be heavily skewed if you have a zero or very low score for one or more positions, even if it's a position that your game plan de-emphasizes. For example, if a team has no fullbacks, the Roster Rating will be significantly less than the team's true talent level, even if said team's game plan is to use single-back formations 100% of the time.
REGULAR SEASON WEEK THREE & AFTERWARD: The power rating displayed is 100% performance-based. I don't know all of the components, but it's clear that scoring differential and strength of schedule are major parts of this. There is noroster-related adjustment to the calculation after week two is complete. Like any computerized power rating, its accuracy increases as more games are played.
Comment
-
No problem. I've been paying attention to the Power Rating calculations very closely, actually, and it was just two days ago that I got the last piece of the puzzle in place that would allow me to post that definitively.Originally posted by Jave View PostOhh ok, that makes total sense then. Thanks for the info Skydog.
My guess is that Jim didn't want crazy variations to the Power Rating in the first couple of weeks, so the "safest" way to do that was to give the "best" teams high ratings that didn't change. But if a team with a good roster goes 0-2, or a team with a bad roster goes 2-0, you'll see those wild fluctuations anyway. *shurg*
Comment

Comment