Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

help

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Well, two regular season games ago I beat you 38-9. My offense is better this year, so...
    "Larry Deasoooooooooooooooooon" -- Phil Jenkins

    Comment


    • #32
      In case you didn't notice, your safeties blow. At the very least Murfreesboro has a better secondary (and better secondary cohesion).
      "Larry Deasoooooooooooooooooon" -- Phil Jenkins

      Comment


      • #33
        42-14 Portland puts a pasting on you.

        35-24 Anchorage next game we play Potland.

        No way does a team score 40+ on us the rest of the year. Looking at my offensive and defensive game-plans they were totally out-of-whack last game. We'll correct that and I say we have a chance to go 14-2, 13-3, 12-4. California you'll fiddle around with 8-8 and claim next year will be your year.

        Comment


        • #34
          ANC is irrelevant. seriously. stop.


          Claire, That's Disgusting - A Heroes Blog

          Comment


          • #35
            your momma! :dancing:

            Comment


            • #36
              Seriously stop. You gotta be shitting me.

              This is how the division will shake out the next 2, 3 years:

              optionA 1. Anchorage 2. Portland. 3. LA. 4. CA
              optionB 1. Portland 2. Anchorage 3. LA 4. CA

              As you can see im leaning towards option A. I don't know, call it a hunch.

              This is how your team BREAKS-Down. As any idiot can see you built your team for only 2-3 years down the road. Lets go by position groups.

              QB- Ike Jordan. 19 3rd down, 16 readdef, 8 2minoff. Will not get it done.

              RB- Chapman was a nice pick up but how long will it take for him to develope.

              WR-Mullin and no one else.

              OL- Venegas, Ricciardi, Ingraham are in decline and are gone in the next two years. No depth and no one new to replace those guys.

              DL- Lundquist and Otely see above.

              LB- Callan and no one else.

              CB- One strength. Bruner and Edwards make a good combo, but will their weak safeties negate their play.

              S- Almeida is decent but Fillmore is in decline.

              That pretty much sums it up for ya, why you'll finish last the next couple of seasons. When your aging vets retire "God forbid" what you do... :injured:

              Comment


              • #37
                you're the one who's selling off your players. you got a lot of your one-time main guys on your trade block. you've already moved Scharf. you have little on your team outside of Steiner.

                weak safeties? Almeida is 4th alltime in INTs. he picked up 2 in week one. how does that make him weak? wait, don't answer that. if you think my team is in decline then your opinion is worthless.

                young players on the team: Chapman - already showing he's gonna be one of the good backs in this league. obviously Mullin - i need not say any more. you conveniently left out TE Juan McElroy - of course you would, you were trying too hard to make a bad point. CB Duane Edwards - one of the top young CBs in the league. at LB i've already started to get younger with Stevens.

                you confuse players in decline with players in their prime. Otey is a 9 yr vet. Ingraham is in his prime. Venegas has another 3 yrs in him.

                for cohesion purposes you just can't filter out the old to bring in the new. look at all the guys you pointed out - i have playmakers at every position. some are just starting their careers, others are in the middle of it and a handful of others will be winding things down in a season or two. but it's still a good team. it's not just "you don't have a good QB, so now you will lose". we obviously proved that wrong in week one. over the course of the season we'll lose more than we'll win. but don't make the mistake of thinking your squad is "better". you don't have the playmakers i do. you don't even know what you want to do with your team. who can you say you've added that has clearly positioned your team to win more games? you've added no one of significant value. so if you're not adding impact players and in fact are trading off some of your better guys (Scharf), what does that say about your team and where it's headed.

                again, your team is irrelevant. 2nd place is clearly up for grabs.


                Claire, That's Disgusting - A Heroes Blog

                Comment


                • #38
                  I got more playmakers than you period. Plus we have cohesion to boot. You're a no factor and you know it. Mullin and Edwards is all you got. All your weaknesses will be revealed next game vs. Madison. 31-17 they blow you out...have fun going 7-9, 6-10.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    that's why you're not a good GM and you've never won anything in this league. Mullin and Edwards is all i have? ok, debate over. anything more is a waste of time. normally i love to debate about this stuff but if you're gonna just start pulling shit out of your ass with no regard for truth or no regard for making valid points then it's a waste of time.


                    Claire, That's Disgusting - A Heroes Blog

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      See three posts above. Gave my reasons...sky-dogs game plan library won't help you.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X