Problem with current check-in system....

[iceman99]

Yeah I had a similar issue in another league. I had alot of talent heading for the FA market, some good talent too. But due to the very limited cap space I could not resign them. And since we were so deep in the season I was unable to cut enough folks to free up enough cap space. And even on guys that I am reducing their overall numbers per season, the new Bonus gets tacked on and makes it harder.

David

[Hell Atlantic]

i say leave it as-is. one benefit of having a small roster with no good players is you essentially get an "empty-cupboard" challenge. rather than the previous regime resigning players you wouldn't want to keep and being forced to either stick with them or do away with them (and create dead cap space), you get to start from scratch. sure, you ain't winning any champioships anytime soon but you need high draft picks anyway to infuse young talent. flexibility is more important to a new owner than a full roster. obvioulsy there isn't much worth keeping on the team anyway or else the old owner would have stuck around, it's very easy to leave a shitty team with no potential. it's very rare people walk away from a good thing, so new owners already assume coming in they got a lot of work to do.

also, from a role playing perspective, you can say the old ownership wanted to keep the payroll low so as to make the team more attractive to prospective buyers. no one would want to buy a team stuck with awful, undumpable contracts.

[iceman99]

I agree, when you take a new team there are very few people that do not like the challenge of rebuilding it. I just have issues with the ones that trade away all there picks both present and future but are not smart about how they sign those they trade for which gives you no foundation to rebuild off of....

[Matt]

Ahh. I assumed that it always worked as it currently does.

I try restructure for less money at the start of the season. Towards the end I'm just looking to add a season or two to otherwise departing players.

it was not intentional. i just never paid attention, thinking i had time to do it all season. apparently i was wrong:evil:

[JesterBlaze]

i say leave it as-is. one benefit of having a small roster with no good players is you essentially get an "empty-cupboard" challenge. rather than the previous regime resigning players you wouldn't want to keep and being forced to either stick with them or do away with them (and create dead cap space), you get to start from scratch. sure, you ain't winning any champioships anytime soon but you need high draft picks anyway to infuse young talent. flexibility is more important to a new owner than a full roster.....

that's as far as I read and when you proved you can't comprehend for the 2nd time I decided not to get dumber by reading the rest.

Learn what flexibility means, please. When a choice is made for you, regardless of direction, you have NO flexibiilty. When YOU get to choose between 2 or more choices THEN you have flexibility.