TB offers its congratulations to the two participants in Imperial Bowl VII, the HARTFORD GRIZZLIES & the LAWRENCE PHANTOMS
A TRIVIA BYTES PRE-GAME FESTIVITY CONTRIBUTION
Thanks to roadrash and the data base, TB will publish some interesting benchmarks for all of you stat geeks. Data is TEAM, not INDIVIDUAL.
Enjoy as pre-game fodder before the kickoff. Compare your team's performance and rankings to the Imperial Bowl contenders - Hartford & Lawrence.
Perhaps you might find an area that needs attention for your team next year.
OFFENSIVE BENCHMARK TRIVIA
:arrow: KEY RUN BLOCK % -- Hartford ranked #5 (35.0%); Lawrence ranked #7 (34.7%)
BEST 36.4%, Reno
MEDIAN 32.8%,
WORST 23.7%,Lansing
:arrow: SACKS ALLOWED % (based on total passing plays) - Hartford ranked #9 (0.7%); Lawrence ranked #6 (0.6%)
BEST 0.5%, Iowa City
MEDIAN 0.8%,
WORST 1.5%,Boston
:arrow: FUMBLES - Hartford ranked #31 (22); Lawrence ranked #3 ( 8 )
BEST 6, Salt Lake City
MEDIAN 15
WORST 23,Albuquerque
:arrow: INTERCEPTIONS - Hartford ranked #7 ( 11 ); Lawrence ranked #8 (12)
BEST 6, Portland
MEDIAN 16
WORST 29, Dakota
:arrow: COMPLETION % - Hartford ranked #6 (59.5%); Lawrence ranked #21 (55.4%)
BEST 65.9%, Little Rock
MEDIAN 56.5%
WORST 50.8%,West Virginai
DEFENSIVE BENCHMARK TRIVIA
:arrow: SACKS - Hartford ranked #2 ( 38 ); Lawrence ranked #3 (37)
BEST 39, Salt Lake City
MEDIAN 28
WORST 10,Orlando
:arrow: HURRIES - Hartford ranked #16 ( 68 ); Lawrence ranked #2 (86)
BEST 88, Little Rock
MEDIAN 68
WORST 48,West Virginia
:arrow: BLOCKED PASSES - Hartford ranked #27 (14); Lawrence ranked #1 (27)
BEST 27, Little Rock
MEDIAN 17
WORST 7,West Virginia
:arrow: INTERCEPTIONS - Hartford ranked #27 (13); Lawrence ranked #10 ( 18 )
BEST 29, Murfreesboro
MEDIAN 17
WORST 9,Pittsburgh
:arrow: OPPOSING QB RATING - Hartford ranked #19 (80.0); Lawrence ranked #3 (70.0)
BEST 68.8, Houston
MEDIAN 77.7
WORST 96.1,Vermont
:arrow: FORCED FUMBLES - Hartford ranked #21 (12); Lawrence ranked #18 (14)
BEST 23, Albuquerque
MEDIAN 15
WORST 9,Little Rock
:arrow: FUMBLE RECOVERY % - Hartford ranked #24 (45.5%); Lawrence ranked #27 (41.2%)
BEST 66.7%, Houston
MEDIAN 50.0%
WORST 29.4%,Salt Lake City
SPECIAL TEAMS BENCHMARK TRIVIA
:arrow: FG % - Hartford ranked #4 (87.95%); Lawrence ranked #16 (78.9%)
BEST 91.3%, Reno
MEDIAN 78.7%
WORST 66.7%,St. Louis
:arrow: PUNTING AVE - Hartford ranked #22 (41.4); Lawrence ranked #25 (40.9)
BEST 45.2, Madison
MEDIAN 42.4
WORST 37.8West Virginia
:arrow: PUNT RETURN AVE - Hartford ranked #24 (6.0; Lawrence ranked #16 (7.1)
BEST 15.0, Norfolk
MEDIAN 7.1
WORST 3.6,Vermont
:arrow: KICK RETURN AVE - Hartford ranked #18 (22.1); Lawrence ranked #4 (26.9)
BEST 28.8, Norfolk
MEDIAN 22.2
WORST 17.1,Texas
A TRIVIA BYTES PRE-GAME FESTIVITY CONTRIBUTION
Thanks to roadrash and the data base, TB will publish some interesting benchmarks for all of you stat geeks. Data is TEAM, not INDIVIDUAL.
Enjoy as pre-game fodder before the kickoff. Compare your team's performance and rankings to the Imperial Bowl contenders - Hartford & Lawrence.
Perhaps you might find an area that needs attention for your team next year.
OFFENSIVE BENCHMARK TRIVIA
:arrow: KEY RUN BLOCK % -- Hartford ranked #5 (35.0%); Lawrence ranked #7 (34.7%)
BEST 36.4%, Reno
MEDIAN 32.8%,
WORST 23.7%,Lansing
:arrow: SACKS ALLOWED % (based on total passing plays) - Hartford ranked #9 (0.7%); Lawrence ranked #6 (0.6%)
BEST 0.5%, Iowa City
MEDIAN 0.8%,
WORST 1.5%,Boston
:arrow: FUMBLES - Hartford ranked #31 (22); Lawrence ranked #3 ( 8 )
BEST 6, Salt Lake City
MEDIAN 15
WORST 23,Albuquerque
:arrow: INTERCEPTIONS - Hartford ranked #7 ( 11 ); Lawrence ranked #8 (12)
BEST 6, Portland
MEDIAN 16
WORST 29, Dakota
:arrow: COMPLETION % - Hartford ranked #6 (59.5%); Lawrence ranked #21 (55.4%)
BEST 65.9%, Little Rock
MEDIAN 56.5%
WORST 50.8%,West Virginai
DEFENSIVE BENCHMARK TRIVIA
:arrow: SACKS - Hartford ranked #2 ( 38 ); Lawrence ranked #3 (37)
BEST 39, Salt Lake City
MEDIAN 28
WORST 10,Orlando
:arrow: HURRIES - Hartford ranked #16 ( 68 ); Lawrence ranked #2 (86)
BEST 88, Little Rock
MEDIAN 68
WORST 48,West Virginia
:arrow: BLOCKED PASSES - Hartford ranked #27 (14); Lawrence ranked #1 (27)
BEST 27, Little Rock
MEDIAN 17
WORST 7,West Virginia
:arrow: INTERCEPTIONS - Hartford ranked #27 (13); Lawrence ranked #10 ( 18 )
BEST 29, Murfreesboro
MEDIAN 17
WORST 9,Pittsburgh
:arrow: OPPOSING QB RATING - Hartford ranked #19 (80.0); Lawrence ranked #3 (70.0)
BEST 68.8, Houston
MEDIAN 77.7
WORST 96.1,Vermont
:arrow: FORCED FUMBLES - Hartford ranked #21 (12); Lawrence ranked #18 (14)
BEST 23, Albuquerque
MEDIAN 15
WORST 9,Little Rock
:arrow: FUMBLE RECOVERY % - Hartford ranked #24 (45.5%); Lawrence ranked #27 (41.2%)
BEST 66.7%, Houston
MEDIAN 50.0%
WORST 29.4%,Salt Lake City
SPECIAL TEAMS BENCHMARK TRIVIA
:arrow: FG % - Hartford ranked #4 (87.95%); Lawrence ranked #16 (78.9%)
BEST 91.3%, Reno
MEDIAN 78.7%
WORST 66.7%,St. Louis
:arrow: PUNTING AVE - Hartford ranked #22 (41.4); Lawrence ranked #25 (40.9)
BEST 45.2, Madison
MEDIAN 42.4
WORST 37.8West Virginia
:arrow: PUNT RETURN AVE - Hartford ranked #24 (6.0; Lawrence ranked #16 (7.1)
BEST 15.0, Norfolk
MEDIAN 7.1
WORST 3.6,Vermont
:arrow: KICK RETURN AVE - Hartford ranked #18 (22.1); Lawrence ranked #4 (26.9)
BEST 28.8, Norfolk
MEDIAN 22.2
WORST 17.1,Texas



Comment