With the 1st Pick of the 2004 IFL Draft. . .

[roadrash]

1st: Gene Hamilton, QB, OAK
2nd: Marshal Cuomo, LG, LRK
3rd: Wayne Ostrowski, RG, HOU
4th: Oliver Mckensie, RCB, PIT
5th: Wesley Connell, RB, BUR
6th: Darrell Wilson, QB, LAN
7th: Butch Anderson, LG, LAW
8th: Ricardo Andrews, RB, TEX
9th: Sean Bratxke, LDT, NWK
10th: TJ Doser, RG, BOS
11th: Maurice House, NT, IWC
12th: Kyle Hartman, RT, MNT
13th: Skip Hildebrand, WB, MUR
14th: Rueben Sante, QB, FRE
15th: Ben Hastings, LCB, NFK
16th: Courtney Parker, QB, AQU
17th: Amos Burnhill, LT, ANC
18th: Trent Hayden, LDT, TUL
19th: Joel Duffy, RB, LOU
20th: Stan Reed, RT, STL
21st: Brian Pihos, LG, CBA
22nd: Jonathan Russell, FL, FAR
23rd: Quentin Logan, TE, HAR
24th: Jermaine Goodwin, RT, CBA


So how am I doing?

[sovstar]

But Mr. Hamilton may possibly have a ' 0 ' in holding ability.

[roadrash]

But Mr. Hamilton may possibly have a ' 0 ' in holding ability.

I think he is worth the risk

[morellomre]

darrell wilson with the 6th pick?? that would be worse then taking lawrence phillips with the 6th pick, like vermeil did in 96.

[sovstar]

darrell wilson with the 6th pick?? that would be worse then taking lawrence phillips with the 6th pick, like vermeil did in 96.

Vermeil wasn't even in football during 1996. And hindsight 20/20 on Phillips, but who knew he would end up being such a headcase.

[roadrash]

darrell wilson with the 6th pick?? that would be worse then taking lawrence phillips with the 6th pick, like vermeil did in 96.

What's wrong with Wilson? +65 potential, Low Votality? Is it the low kick holding that everyone is talking about?

[Cringer]

I guess roadrash.


My bigest knock would be is curent ratings are low, so it's gonna take some time. But shit, if you need a QB, you need a QB. I think he could easily end up being a top 10 pick.

[RendeR]

Vermeil wasn't even in football during 1996. And hindsight 20/20 on Phillips, but who knew he would end up being such a headcase.

It was obvious phillips would suck in the NFL, he was from NEBRASKA wasn't he?

[morellomre]

What's wrong with Wilson?  +65 potential, Low Votality?  Is it the low kick holding that everyone is talking about?

sure hes got great potential, but hes low current, and his dash strength and agility tests are average at best. doesnt make me think he could fulfill all that potential.

[Cringer]

sure hes got great potential, but hes low current, and his dash strength and agility tests are average at best. doesnt make me think he could fulfill all that potential.

most QB's are low current. Even if he was at 20 current he still would struggle plenty in year one.

[Warhammer]

most QB's are low current. Even if he was at 20 current he still would struggle plenty in year one.

That's my problem with all the QBs in the draft. Aside from Mr. Gene, I have reservations about each QB. Although, once you get past the guys with the high future pot., there isn't much left to choose from.

[Suicane]

I am not taking a QB in the first round, no way in hell.

[roadrash]

In the NFL, I would never pick a QB in the first. . but in the IFL, I'll take one with high potential if they have a low votality. . .