Worst division?

[Ragin]

Because I am in this division that gives me the right to say the AFC South is f...ing HORRIBLE!!! With that being said, 2 of my 3 wins are against the AFC East so....I'm voting for them. :lol:

[JesterBlaze]

Too close right now....

I'm not even sure it's one of those two divisions as the records so far are not indicitive of the teams strength yet due to some early season matchups and upsets IMO.

[Warhammer]

I said the AC South because I'm in the AC East and I am 1-1 against the AC South.

I think Louisiana matches up well against the teams in the East which explains why they do well against the division. Plus, I know they have had the anti-Grizzly game plan since 2003, as they always do the same thing against us. The problem is it works... ops:

[Cringer]

Hmmm, no AFC North choice? They have some disappointing teams this year. Cleveland and Montreal are doing well though I guess......

I would have to lean towards the South right now. Mules are not all that good. Houston I think has the potential as always, and even though they are getting more out of it this year they are still a questionable team at this point. St. Louis is a big disappointment obviously, not sure what happened there, the IB jinx? IB hang over? And the VooDoo have been a little shaky too.

[SteveBsFan]

I may be biased, but i'm going to say it's not the South. I would actually go with the North. Cleveland is clearly the best team of that division, but other than that the teams aren't as tough. I mean when the defending champs are 3rd, it can't exactly be an 'easy' division. StL is better than their record, they just suffered a few key injuries recently and had to face the big bad Renegades twice already :twisted:

It's not taking away what Cleveland has done, they'd probably be first in our division too, but I think they'd have an easier ride up north than down south.

The East is probably the 2nd best division in the conference behind of course the West. Norfolk has a great team, Hartford and WV are both solid teams, and the team with the worst record (Boston) would possibly be fighting for a division lead in the South or North.

[Warhammer]

The East is probably the 2nd best division in the conference behind of course the West. Norfolk has a great team, Hartford and WV are both solid teams, and the team with the worst record (Boston) would possibly be fighting for a division lead in the South or North.

I may be biased but the AC East has ALWAYS been one of the toughest divisions in the game. But, I think we are on our way down. Yes, Norfolk has a great team, WVA is very good, but Boston is still a year away and Harftord is overachieving from a personnel standpoint.

Still, if WVA can retool without a significant dropoff (I doubt it, Sanders is their key and until they get a good replacement, I think they will struggle), if Boston can stay healthy and not lose any players to injury, and if Hartford can continue their rebuilding, this will be one of the best divisions over the next two years.

I think the biggest question is WVA, how good will they be when Sanders retires?

[MrBigglesworth]

I think the biggest question is WVA, how good will they be when Sanders retires?

That depends on who they get to replace him. Billy Del Greco isn't the answer.

[Warhammer]

I think the biggest question is WVA, how good will they be when Sanders retires?

That depends on who they get to replace him. Billy Del Greco isn't the answer.

Exactly! Now Deron Markel could look pretty good behind that line, but they need to pry him from my hands first!