Training Camps

[Kobeck]

Took a step back (highest loss in current)

-6/0 Gallup, Dennis MLB 5 Murfreesboro Mules
...
-4/0 Maas, Mason SS 4 Murfreesboro Mules



Rookie disappointments (highest loss in future)

-1/-11 Donaldson, Graham RCB 1 Murfreesboro Mules

Lets just say that Mitchell Fulcher has Gallup and Maas with significantly better camps that this, and Fulcher is Excellent at LB evaluation and Good with secondary.

As for Donaldson, it was bad but Fulcher did not have it quite as bad as Rumor Mill listed. Too be honest I was scared of this, hoping against it though. Donaldson, despite the drop in potential with his move from his natural S position, will see plenty of playing time in the nickle role for the Mules. But if left at S he would have likley been a game day inactive barring injury. So although I am a little dissappointed I am not suprised.

BTW Fulcher had Gallup and Maas a combined 14 points better than the
-10 the Rumor Mill posted. Training Camps are interesting indeed.

BTW DE Williams had a decent training camp +4/0 and was last seen on a greyhoung bus heading west.

[luis]

OK. I'm officially lost. What do these numbers mean? And where are you getting them from? :?:

[Rumor Mill]

Kobeck: I believe you may be using different baseline numbers than I am. It's possible that your scout downgraded your players when they were added to your team, that was not taken into account in my analysis. I don't think that the FOF scouting algorithm allows one scout to see an increase and another a decrease, but I could be wrong.

luis: Numbers are (difference in current)/(difference in future) between right after the draft and right after training camp, essentially the effect of training camp on the players.